
I think most guys know that majority of girls are secretly 90% lesbian when it comes to aesthetics. That's why sex sells often refers to the female form instead of the male and female form. On one hand it's true, yes - girls can look at a photograph and think, "I wish I was that appealing" but also think, "She's really hot." So concludes the impression I get from conversations I have with other girls while I caught a glimpse of the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show. Most of the time, girls just have a more aesthetically pleasing body to look at!
What is more appealing to visualize or draw? A circle or a square?
Which form of perfection is harder to achieve? Perfect circle or perfect square?
Maybe our interest in human figures lie in simply geometry and mathematics. In the end, I believe in maths more than I do in science, although I think both are equally valid, science is still shaky. Math is always one solution. Multiple ways to get there, but one destination. I love the concept of math - but I hate doing it.
There's a really powerful deviant art photograph that I won't directly post here (but here's the link
deviant art image) called "power lines" that depicts the feminine form in perfection. In my case, I'm not sexually attracted but merely amazed at how all these Gestalt principles work in the human form. Basically, at it's peak, when it's not over done, excessive or degraded, the human form is really something to look at.
It's like a story. The bare skin might have words or it might not say anything at all, but somehow you can read a story from simply the body itself. It's harder to see that happening on men's body's, but for the most part, I think the female form, no matter the size, really has an individual story because there just so much in the expanse of skin itself.
Skin. The way it seems to curve over the flesh, not like it's one piece, but just a drapery that can change color, size, tone - a curtain that unveils some story underneath.
Is my analysis borderline creepy here? I just find it really fascinating because in art, the female form is used so much. Girls are the subject of advertising, yet also the receivers of the message. More often than not, one of the most beautiful things on earth can be degraded to such distasteful measures like porn or sexual deviantations - suddenly it's not a story anymore but a/n over/used prop.
I guess what I'm trying to say is, girls really are like books. All our lives, we're writing our own story by the way we try to present ourselves.

Mysterious intrigue and descriptive beauty is what attracts a reader.
Sorry for the long post, but here is a reading from Xanga that I adored.
“What if I only wanted her for her body? What if I only wanted to greet her in the morning with my lips and tell her good night the same way?
What if I only wanted wanted to hold her hand as tightly as possible, have her grip in my own and wrap her in my arms. Touch her every corner and curve and tease her until she touched me back.
What if I only wanted her eyes to pierce deeply into my soul and read my mind. Connect with my own eyes and have a private conversation in a code only she can understand. With each passing glance she would know exactly how I feel and I her.
What if I only wanted her for her feet? To walk with me during the hard times and kick away the crap that plagued my being. To stamp down with authority in her own opinions and get a running start surprising me by taking the initiative to jump at any moment she sees fit.What if I only wanted her for her chest? Something I could lay my head on and listen to the measure of her heart, and how much of it beats for me when I’m near. Something to make me remember “if you respect her, you’ll look at her in the eyes when she’s talking to you.”
What if I only wanted her for her backside. Something to sneak up on and wrap my arms around for nothing but the simple pleasure of feeling her against me. Just a subtle way to remind her that through everything “I’ve got her back.”
So, whats wrong if I only wanted her for her body?”
credits